Відео

The PC version is a big nope. Why? 1) QUICKSAVES - Towards the end, the levels are getting huge, and there's NO SAVES. You'll enjoy the quicksaves of emulators instead. 2) FPS - You're stuck with 30 FPS. If you modify the files to force it to use 60 FPS, it has some bugs that make the game unplayable eventually. 3) CONTROLS - They're ABYSMAL. Like, you WILL pull your hair out screaming. That's how infuriating they are. Gamepad controls on PS2/XBOX are infinitely more enjoyable. Personally, I choose the PS2 version. Everybody says that the PS2 version is the worst, but frankly, if you activate widescreen patch + ALL texture improvements in the settings, it looks very nice. Just look up the most recent videos of Emperor's Tomb played with PCSX2. No blur, stable 60 FPS, sharp textures... PC will always look the best, but if you weigh the pros and cons, in the end, you just enjoy the PS2 version more. As for the Xbox, the emulation of that console is still terrible after two decades. I gave up on it. Except for the controls, the problems I mentioned on PC are the same on Xbox.

I never knew this and Chronicles were released to the PS1. I thought they were released for the newer consoles. Got both on the Dreamcast. I do agree that the colors are better in the PS1.

it because xbox graphic dont need to work hard...it dark dont see much texture like ps2

Best version is the Gamecube, since that is the only version you can emulate at solid 60 fps

When you remember that with the first game the Saturn version was considered the inferior one, and now Sega in the lead.

If only they had made a gamecube port

I think the most interesting part of this video is to see how different the PS2 version is compared to Xbox/GameCube. I thought they were the exact same game, with just small graphical differences, but it seems the Xbox/GameCube versions had quite a few improvements, including better cutcenes.

Development Team: "hey boss what kind of textures shall we use on the PS2 version?" The boss: "textures?"

3:14 GC have glitch in shadows 😅

I grew up playing on PS2 but I play on Xbox now because it looks and plays better.

This game was a technical Marvel when it came out.

I guess the real question is, real hardware or emulation?

The wii is graphically the best, but xbox 720p is the best fidelity wise. I wonder why they couldn't do 720 on the wii. Probably was asking too much from it

Amo o Dreamcast mas esse port ficou porco pois no PS1 me pareceu bem melhor e mais vivo nas cores ,no Dreamcast tá muito escuro e sem cor

Xbox has better textures and lightning effect than that of PS2 edition.

The weird thing about the OG Xbox is that the textures slowly start to come into view once your character slows down or stop. Cuz it's a bit blurred when he's running. But at least the color scheme and contrast is way better on Xbox than PS2

Acredito que até o tomb raider the angel of darkness iria rodar no DC, uma pena o console durar Tao pouco tempo.

Played the Cube version. Yea it's terrible the way it runs but it was great fun. I would recommend a newcomer play this on PS2

Dreamcast 👌👌🔥

Both Playstation versions are the best out of these four here, although like fans would say, the Playstation and Game Boy Color were the most faithful, and the latter captures the tonality of the book best.

na boa só umas texturinhas diferentes e nada mais

and that's why i'm sad that the only PC available version is the PS2 one :(

My Dreamcast never looked washed out like this, looks like the brightness and contrast turned up! You can see by the Dreamcast logo what you did there! 😂 fanboy

Ps2 suck

Didnt steven seagal play Turok at one point?

My eyes keep gravitating to the PS2 and GameCube version sadly

Wow the gc port really sucked, havent realised til now

19 County.... IM IN THE DITCH LOL

I wonder what the dreamcast version would be like....

PS2 = software rendering mode, XBOX = 3DFX lol but the ps2 version does have better lighting and smoke fx, with a choppy framerate and lower res. PS2 = 6GFLOPS, GC = 9GFLOPS, XBOX = 20GFLOPS!

The differences are so mundane and subtle in my opinion but its mainly all about the controllers and how they feel. Try playing DarkWatch or max Payne 2 on PS2 and Xbox or gta 4 on 360 and PS3 and get back to me. The textures and resolution are totally different in those games compared to this and other games

I was expecting a lot better on the Dreamcast, but it looks like they did a lazy port without using the DC capabilities.

PS2 version is way better.

Tengo Max Pat e en Xbox y ps2, el de ps2 se ve terrible comparado a la versión de Xbox, hasta parece de una generación atrás la de ps2

I played the xbox version as a kid and it broke my heart to find out that you were able to run around the castle grounds freely on the PS2 since that was not a thing on xbox.

XBOX>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>PS2

I think I need a Dreamcast at some point...

60 vs 30 fps lol

Almost no improvement in the DC version. 😮😢

They look pretty comparable to me. Bloom is definitely more pronounced on PS2. Maybe a bit excessive. Also, Xbox seemed to be running really poorly during that landing sequence.

PS2 and Xbox look pretty good

No way ps2 looks that good on a standard deff tv.

XBOX so smooth.

okay i wanted to check this out as i own the xbox version, but max's in-game dialogue is quieter and gets drowned out if not unhearable when sound effects play yet here the xbox version seems to sound fine...how'd they do that?? was checking to see if ps2 audio was better but now I'm just wondering how they got the xbox version to sound right

Ps2 has some interesting shadows and contrast effects over the others (I believe the ps2 version was made first), but it runs so, so bad. Sub 30fps at times from the look of it. Xbox also has some really cool added visual effects over the other two, like glass effects. Also, the loading times. Egads the ps2 has inexcusable loading times.

Honestly, I don't think the PS2 version is that bad. The XBOX has some neat for the time shader effects and noticably higher resolution textures. But that's to be expected. The PS2 version looks alright on its own. Hey, at least you still get shadow maps 😅 In many cases the PS2 just got blop shadows.

Lets get the homebrew community to make a Max Payne Dreamcast port. I know, I know, it would be scaled down tremendously, but seeing what the homebrew community is starting to do with some Saturn stuff it'd be nice to see what may actually be done with the DC.

Even i could say the ps2 version is a new game in everything

You can definitely tell the woes that devs had early on with the PS2. The performance and visuals are pretty significantly impacted between the two versions. The Xbox is the more powerful console to be certain, but the PS2 was able to produce MGS3 (coupled with its share of frame rate problems in intense scenes) which looked almost next gen when it came out. So, it's always interesting to see these games early in the PS2s lifespan struggle to make the most of Sony's famously convoluted hardware. You can look up the difficulties there yourself. We went on to see the same story play out with the PS3 and Xbox 360. With the 360 have a significantly faster GPU, however the margin was narrowed when devs finally learned how to use the SPEs and use more of the Blu-Ray Discs storage to lighten the GPU load with uncompressed assets. With how complex Uncharted 3 and The Last of Us were for their time, while the GPU from the 360 might have been able to make it work, there was no way that the 360's CPU was going to manage that level of complexity.

It would be incredible Max payne 1,2and 3 remastered for ps5 and series x